<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Interaction with Blogsome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/</link>
	<description>Home of MistyLook and other great WordPress Themes !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:49:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogsome</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogsome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>I think an important fact is being missed here.  First Sadish requested that we include his templates.  When this issue arose we said that we would not use his templates if he didn&#039;t want us to.

Also ads on the site are not compulsory.

Point that was made by Sadish but worth re-iterating:
Just a clarify a couple of point:

- Blogsome links back to the theme developer in three locations (1) from the admin section of every blogger’s blog - under “themes” - the only way they can select a template (2) in the “designs” page which is linked directly from our home page and (3) in the code of the theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think an important fact is being missed here.  First Sadish requested that we include his templates.  When this issue arose we said that we would not use his templates if he didn&#8217;t want us to.</p>
<p>Also ads on the site are not compulsory.</p>
<p>Point that was made by Sadish but worth re-iterating:<br />
Just a clarify a couple of point:</p>
<p>- Blogsome links back to the theme developer in three locations (1) from the admin section of every blogger’s blog &#8211; under “themes” &#8211; the only way they can select a template (2) in the “designs” page which is linked directly from our home page and (3) in the code of the theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>Btw, the linked license is flexible that anyone can build further upon your work provided they release the work using same license. So, theme porting should be easy for other people. :)

JD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, the linked license is flexible that anyone can build further upon your work provided they release the work using same license. So, theme porting should be easy for other people. :)</p>
<p>JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>You should use this license.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/

This mean that people can not use your themes for commercial purposes WITHOUT your permission and credit must be given to original author.

And thanks for the wonderful work guys! :)

JD


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should use this license.</p>
<p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/" rel="nofollow">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/</a></p>
<p>This mean that people can not use your themes for commercial purposes WITHOUT your permission and credit must be given to original author.</p>
<p>And thanks for the wonderful work guys! :)</p>
<p>JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>Obviously and through their own actions Blogsome has demonstrated that they like your software, therefore ethical and courteous behavior should dictate that Blogsome acknowledge your work in some way.  Otherwise they appear to be underhanded and deceitful, in my opinion.  I use one of your themes myself, but I don&#039;t use Blogsome, so in my book you are greater than they are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously and through their own actions Blogsome has demonstrated that they like your software, therefore ethical and courteous behavior should dictate that Blogsome acknowledge your work in some way.  Otherwise they appear to be underhanded and deceitful, in my opinion.  I use one of your themes myself, but I don&#8217;t use Blogsome, so in my book you are greater than they are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Another great idea, Blips! Sadish, I think we should!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great idea, Blips! Sadish, I think we should!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blips</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Blips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 03:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>Could you use a copyright with something like &quot;free for non profit use&quot; in your own policy...???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you use a copyright with something like &#8220;free for non profit use&#8221; in your own policy&#8230;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paticia</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>Paticia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>Cronos,

as  far as I know, other themes are not linked either. I don&#039;t know if other developes are aware of this or not. But my guess is that they are. Maybe it would be a good idea to contact them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cronos,</p>
<p>as  far as I know, other themes are not linked either. I don&#8217;t know if other developes are aware of this or not. But my guess is that they are. Maybe it would be a good idea to contact them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cronos</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>cronos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>i agree with patricia and michele, it is unethical to remove the link to the themes&#039; creators to begin with, but it is way out of line to flat out reject the request to add the link when the creator asked for it. not to mention they are profiting from it.

there are several other themes from different creators that are being used in blogsome, does this happen to them too? how do they feel about this? is it worthy of your time to contact them and notify them about this sadish? some of them might not even know about blogsome and how their themes are used for profit with the link to the authors deleted. 

just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with patricia and michele, it is unethical to remove the link to the themes&#8217; creators to begin with, but it is way out of line to flat out reject the request to add the link when the creator asked for it. not to mention they are profiting from it.</p>
<p>there are several other themes from different creators that are being used in blogsome, does this happen to them too? how do they feel about this? is it worthy of your time to contact them and notify them about this sadish? some of them might not even know about blogsome and how their themes are used for profit with the link to the authors deleted. </p>
<p>just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>I can understand why blogsome would &quot;force&quot; ads - it&#039;s their business model.
Not attributing the themes to their author however is a bit much.
It would be like us using Apache and claiming that we wrote our own httpd daemon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand why blogsome would &#8220;force&#8221; ads &#8211; it&#8217;s their business model.<br />
Not attributing the themes to their author however is a bit much.<br />
It would be like us using Apache and claiming that we wrote our own httpd daemon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpthemes.info/posts/2005/03/01/my-interaction-with-blogsome/#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Michelle. And also, I just realized: the google ads take up space, a lot more than a single, small, regular link would. But running the ads doesn&#039;t bother them. Why? Because they profit from it. Users must have the ads in their blogs no matter what, so why not also have a simple link back to theme developers? How convenient... If it wasn&#039;t for the themes that are offered for free, they wouldn&#039;t have any theme options to offers their users, making the service they GET PAYED to run less attractive. I don&#039;t know. This doesn&#039;t seem right to me.. the more I read and think about it, the more I am convinced of this. It wouldn&#039;t hurt to show a little appreciation and thankfullness to developers who make their work available for free and they benefit from. Why should developers feel thankful that Blogsome is using their themes? Like it&#039;s some sort of prize or something... Come on!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Michelle. And also, I just realized: the google ads take up space, a lot more than a single, small, regular link would. But running the ads doesn&#8217;t bother them. Why? Because they profit from it. Users must have the ads in their blogs no matter what, so why not also have a simple link back to theme developers? How convenient&#8230; If it wasn&#8217;t for the themes that are offered for free, they wouldn&#8217;t have any theme options to offers their users, making the service they GET PAYED to run less attractive. I don&#8217;t know. This doesn&#8217;t seem right to me.. the more I read and think about it, the more I am convinced of this. It wouldn&#8217;t hurt to show a little appreciation and thankfullness to developers who make their work available for free and they benefit from. Why should developers feel thankful that Blogsome is using their themes? Like it&#8217;s some sort of prize or something&#8230; Come on!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
